Tillery v. State

25 S.E. 170, 99 Ga. 209
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 8, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 S.E. 170 (Tillery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tillery v. State, 25 S.E. 170, 99 Ga. 209 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

This case presents no new or important legal question; the evidence pro and cbn as to relationship between the prosecutor and one of the jurors was confused and conflicting, •and the judge was warranted in finding that the alleged relationship did not exist; the evidence did not demand a charge [210]*210upon, the law of involuntary manslaughter, and even if the-statement of the accused authorized a charge upon this subject, no such charge was requested; no error of law was committed at ‘the trial, and there was ample evidence to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

June 8, 1896. By two Justices. Indictment for murder. Before Judge Hart. Laurens superior court. January term, 1896. J. E. HigMoioer and H. P. Howard, for plaintiff in error. H. G. Lewis, solidtor-gmeral, and T. L. Griner,. by Anderson, Felder & Davis, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Kitchens
148 S.E. 754 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 170, 99 Ga. 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tillery-v-state-ga-1896.