Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Tillery v. State

Tillery v. State

592 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13243, 1991 WL 265070
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 17, 1991
DocketNo. 90-3793
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 592 So. 2d 1123 (Tillery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tillery v. State, 592 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13243, 1991 WL 265070 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that no reversible error has been demonstrated in the appeal. We specifically decline to address the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel since such issue may not be properly raised for the first time on appeal. See Barber v. State, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1984). This decision is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, motion to address this issue.

ERYIN, WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lines v. State
594 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Wright v. State
592 So. 2d 1123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13243, 1991 WL 265070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tillery-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.