Tillery v. State
592 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13243, 1991 WL 265070
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 1991·No. No. 90-3793·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We find that no reversible error has been demonstrated in the appeal. We specifically decline to address the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel since such issue may not be properly raised for the first time on appeal. See Barber v. State, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1984). This decision is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, motion to address this issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tillery v. State, 592 So. 2d 1123, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13243, 1991 WL 265070 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
592 So. 2d 1123 (Tillery v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lines v. State
594 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Wright v. State
592 So. 2d 1123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)