Tillemans v. Pierce Co. of Minneapolis

687 N.W.2d 181, 2004 Minn. LEXIS 615, 2004 WL 2252078
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 7, 2004·No. A04-1205·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 2, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hojf v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tillemans v. Pierce Co. of Minneapolis, 687 N.W.2d 181, 2004 Minn. LEXIS 615, 2004 WL 2252078 (Mich. 2004).

687 N.W.2d 181 (Tillemans v. Pierce Co. of Minneapolis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)