Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Tillamook City v. Bogart

Tillamook City v. Bogart

496 P.2d 34, 9 Or. App. 428, 1972 Ore. App. LEXIS 991
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 21, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 496 P.2d 34 (Tillamook City v. Bogart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tillamook City v. Bogart, 496 P.2d 34, 9 Or. App. 428, 1972 Ore. App. LEXIS 991 (Or. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on court’s own motion for want of jurisdiction since no constitutional issue is presented in this appeal from conviction for violation of a city ordinance. ORS 221.360. See, City of Portland v. Trumbull Asphalt, 2 Or App 1, 463 P2d 606, Sup Ct review denied (1970); City of Salem v. Kimball, 5 Or App 49, 482 P2d 191 (1971).

In situations like this city attorneys would he well advised to file motions to dismiss, as we previously suggested in footnote 1 in City of Salem v. Kimball, supra.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Klamath Falls v. Campos
565 P.2d 406 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)
State v. Kingsley
527 P.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1974)
City of Mt. Angel v. Van Cleve
515 P.2d 730 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 P.2d 34, 9 Or. App. 428, 1972 Ore. App. LEXIS 991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tillamook-city-v-bogart-orctapp-1972.