Tillamook City v. Bogart
496 P.2d 34, 9 Or. App. 428, 1972 Ore. App. LEXIS 991
Opinion
Appeal dismissed on court’s own motion for want of jurisdiction since no constitutional issue is presented in this appeal from conviction for violation of a city ordinance. ORS 221.360. See, City of Portland v. Trumbull Asphalt, 2 Or App 1, 463 P2d 606, Sup Ct review denied (1970); City of Salem v. Kimball, 5 Or App 49, 482 P2d 191 (1971).
In situations like this city attorneys would he well advised to file motions to dismiss, as we previously suggested in footnote 1 in City of Salem v. Kimball, supra.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tillamook City v. Bogart, 496 P.2d 34, 9 Or. App. 428, 1972 Ore. App. LEXIS 991 (Or. Ct. App. 1972).
496 P.2d 34 (Tillamook City v. Bogart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Klamath Falls v. Campos
565 P.2d 406 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)
State v. Kingsley
527 P.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1974)
City of Mt. Angel v. Van Cleve
515 P.2d 730 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1973)