Tilghman v. State

64 So. 2d 555, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1200
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 17, 1953·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

BUFORD, Justice.

This is the second appearance of this cause before this Court. See Tilghman v. State, Fla., 51 So.2d 785, wherein conviction and judgment were affirmed. That judgment of affirmance set at rest all questions presented on that appeal. Such questions may not be subsequently' presented to the trial court without application granted by the Supreme .Court to so present same. See Kinsey v. State, 155 Fla. 159, 19 So.2d 706; Skipper v. Schumacker, 118 Fla. 867, 160 So. 357.

If any error was made by the lower court in resentencing the appellant on his presentation of the petition for relief (absent the affirmative action of the Supreme Court) and in reducing the original sentence by five years, the result was favorable to ánd not against the appellant and, therefore, - he may not be heard to complain. Excessive sentence does not vitiate judgment.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS and DREW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tilghman v. State, 64 So. 2d 555, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1200 (Fla. 1953).

64 So. 2d 555 (Tilghman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schreck v. State
240 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Solitro v. State
166 So. 2d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Michell v. State Ex Rel. Callahan
154 So. 2d 701 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Tilghman v. Culver
99 So. 2d 282 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Collins v. State
83 So. 2d 6 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Tilghman v. Mayo
82 So. 2d 136 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)