Tilghman v. Galley
This text of 26 F. App'x 311 (Tilghman v. Galley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Montro Lorell Tilghman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Tilghman v. Galley, No. CA-00-2568-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 15, 2001). We deny Tilghman’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F. App'x 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tilghman-v-galley-ca4-2002.