Tilford v. Roberts
This text of 8 Ind. 254 (Tilford v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Money paid, on an executory contract which the recipient of the payment fails to fulfill may be recovered back. Patterson v. Coats, 8 Blackf. 500.
Payment may be made in any thing which the creditor will accept as payment. Louden v. Birt, 4 Ind. R. 566.
The count for money had and received, &e., is sustained by proof that the defendant had received property which might be presumed to have been converted into money. Helvey v. The Board, &c., 6 Blackf. 317.
On the evidence, the judgment in this case is right; and it is affirmed with 5 per cent damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ind. 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tilford-v-roberts-ind-1856.