Tilford v. Roberts

8 Ind. 254
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 1, 1856·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Money paid, on an executory contract which the recipient of the payment fails to fulfill may be recovered back. Patterson v. Coats, 8 Blackf. 500.

Payment may be made in any thing which the creditor will accept as payment. Louden v. Birt, 4 Ind. R. 566.

The count for money had and received, &e., is sustained by proof that the defendant had received property which might be presumed to have been converted into money. Helvey v. The Board, &c., 6 Blackf. 317.

On the evidence, the judgment in this case is right; and it is affirmed with 5 per cent damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tilford v. Roberts, 8 Ind. 254 (Ind. 1856).

8 Ind. 254 (Tilford v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pennville Bank v. Gemmill
165 N.E. 914 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1929)
Cincinnati, H. & D. R. v. McKeen
64 F. 36 (Seventh Circuit, 1894)
Weir v. Hudnut
18 N.E. 24 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1888)
School Town v. Grant
1 N.E. 302 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Weston v. Wiley
78 Ind. 54 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Jewett v. Pleak
43 Ind. 368 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
Hart v. Crawford
41 Ind. 197 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)
Hynds v. Hays
25 Ind. 31 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1865)