Tilden v. Saucelito Land & Ferry Co.

61 Cal. 610, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 670
California Supreme Court·Decided October 26, 1882·No. No. 7,222·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Court:

The sole point discussed on the argument in this case, relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

It is contended that there is no evidence that the plaintiff was ever engaged by the defendant to do the work to recover pay for which the action was brought.

In our judgment the case is one of substantial conflict of evidence on this point, and according to the long settled rule, the verdict cannot be disturbed.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tilden v. Saucelito Land & Ferry Co., 61 Cal. 610, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 670 (Cal. 1882).

61 Cal. 610 (Tilden v. Saucelito Land & Ferry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kerrick
77 P. 711 (California Supreme Court, 1904)