Tilden v. Duden

1 N.Y.S. 292, 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 800, 48 Hun 618, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1301
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 14, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 N.Y.S. 292 (Tilden v. Duden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tilden v. Duden, 1 N.Y.S. 292, 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 800, 48 Hun 618, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1301 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Opinions

Barnard, P. J.

The proof shows that the certificate of sale was not filed within 30 days after the sale. By the express declaration of the act under which the sale was made, the sale is “invalid.” The case is not one which comes within the authorities which hold the filing within a certain time to be directory only. If not filed, .the sale is bad. The tax title must depend on a valid sale. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted; costs to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bruno v. Madison
113 P. 1030 (Utah Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.Y.S. 292, 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 800, 48 Hun 618, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tilden-v-duden-nysupct-1888.