Tilden v. Duden

1 N.Y.S. 292, 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 800, 48 Hun 618, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1301
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 1888·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Barnard, P. J.

The proof shows that the certificate of sale was not filed within 30 days after the sale. By the express declaration of the act under which the sale was made, the sale is “invalid.” The case is not one which comes within the authorities which hold the filing within a certain time to be directory only. If not filed, .the sale is bad. The tax title must depend on a valid sale. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted; costs to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tilden v. Duden, 1 N.Y.S. 292, 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 800, 48 Hun 618, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1301 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

1 N.Y.S. 292 (Tilden v. Duden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bruno v. Madison
113 P. 1030 (Utah Supreme Court, 1911)