Til v. O'Brien
357 N.E.2d 1020, 40 N.Y.2d 902, 389 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3118
This text of 357 N.E.2d 1020 (Til v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Til v. O'Brien, 357 N.E.2d 1020, 40 N.Y.2d 902, 389 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3118 (N.Y. 1976).
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua spon te upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. To the extent that Marco v Sachs (10 NY2d 542) would seem to suggest a contrary result, it is not to be followed (see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 36, subd [b], p 143).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lomber v. Farrow
160 A.D.2d 1146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Corinno Civetta Construction Corp. v. J. Baranello & Sons
453 N.E.2d 549 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Commercial Trading Co. v. Potter Securities Corp.
44 N.Y. 728 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
357 N.E.2d 1020, 40 N.Y.2d 902, 389 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/til-v-obrien-ny-1976.