Til v. O'Brien

357 N.E.2d 1020, 40 N.Y.2d 902, 389 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3118
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 1976·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua spon te upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. To the extent that Marco v Sachs (10 NY2d 542) would seem to suggest a contrary result, it is not to be followed (see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 36, subd [b], p 143).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Til v. O'Brien, 357 N.E.2d 1020, 40 N.Y.2d 902, 389 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3118 (N.Y. 1976).

357 N.E.2d 1020 (Til v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lomber v. Farrow
160 A.D.2d 1146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Corinno Civetta Construction Corp. v. J. Baranello & Sons
453 N.E.2d 549 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Commercial Trading Co. v. Potter Securities Corp.
44 N.Y. 728 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)