Tijerina v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Tijerina v. State

132 S.W.2d 123, 137 Tex. Crim. 458, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 466

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 11, 1939·No. No. 20591.·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen prop-trey under the value of $50. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for six months and a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order. Appellant’s objections to the court’s charge cannot be reviewed in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen prop-trey under the value of $50. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for six months and a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order. Appellant’s objections to the court’s charge cannot be reviewed in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Tijerina v. State, 132 S.W.2d 123, 137 Tex. Crim. 458, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 466 (Tex. 1939).

Pincite

132 S.W.2d 123 (Tijerina v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.