Tijerina, Robert

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 16, 2020
DocketWR-91,466-01
StatusPublished

This text of Tijerina, Robert (Tijerina, Robert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tijerina, Robert, (Tex. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,466-01

EX PARTE ROBERT TIJERINA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 11-11-0277-CRA-A IN THE 81ST DISTRICT COURT FROM ATASCOSA COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant was convicted of three counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent

to deliver and sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment on each count. Applicant did not file a direct

appeal. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that he has been held on a parole revocation warrant for over 300 days,

has not been charged with a new offense, and is being denied a parole revocation hearing. Applicant

has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. TEX . GOV 'T CODE , § 508.282; Ex parte

Cordova, 235 S.W.3d 735, 736 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). Accordingly, the record should be

developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. 2

art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of

the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts addressing

the issue of whether the Parole Board is providing Applicant with a timely parole revocation hearing.

In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the

trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him

at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial

court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The response shall state whether Applicant is being held pursuant to a parole revocation

warrant, and if so, the date upon which that warrant was executed. The response shall state whether

Applicant has been advised of his rights in the revocation process, whether he has requested or

waived a preliminary hearing and whether he has been afforded a preliminary hearing. If Applicant

is also being held on new charges, the response shall state whether Applicant has been indicted on

those charges, and if so, when the indictment was returned. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 3

Filed: September 16, 2020 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Cordova
235 S.W.3d 735 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tijerina, Robert, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tijerina-robert-texcrimapp-2020.