Tigner v. McGehee
60 Miss. 242
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellee is entitled to judgment against the appellant for five per cent damages, by virtue of sect. 1422 of the Code of [244]*2441880, which provides for damages in cases in which none were allowed by the former law. The right of the appellee to judgment for damages on affirmance is independent of whether or not the judgment or decree appealed from is stayed by supersedeas. Damages follow affirmance as a penalty for appealing from a proper judgment or decree.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tigner v. McGehee, 60 Miss. 242 (Mich. 1882).
60 Miss. 242 (Tigner v. McGehee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Jackson v. Williamson
740 So. 2d 818 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1999)
City of Jackson, Mississippi v. Charles Williamson
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1995
Antley v. Mississippi State Highway Com.
318 So. 2d 847 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1975)
Koehring Company v. Hyde Construction Co.
236 So. 2d 377 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1970)
Pearce v. Ford Motor Co.
235 So. 2d 281 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1970)
State Highway Commission v. Mason
4 So. 2d 345 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1941)
Eagle Lumber & Supply Co. v. Robertson
135 So. 499 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)
Canal Bank & Trust Co. v. Brewer
113 So. 552 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1927)
Federal Reserve Bank v. Sparkman
105 So. 637 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1925)
Boyd v. Applewhite
85 So. 87 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1920)