Tighe v. Smith
40 A. 1135, 186 Pa. 82, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 962
This text of 40 A. 1135 (Tighe v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tighe v. Smith, 40 A. 1135, 186 Pa. 82, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 962 (Pa. 1898).
Opinion
This case depended on questions of fact which, under the evidence, were clearly for the consideration of the jury. It was fairly submitted to them by the learned trial judge with instructions which appear to be fully adequate and free from substantial error. We find nothing in the record that would justify a reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 A. 1135, 186 Pa. 82, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tighe-v-smith-pa-1898.