Tighe v. Go Shelk Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tighe v. Go Shelk Cab Corp.

27 A.D.2d 941, 281 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4452

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 941 (Tighe v. Go Shelk Cab Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tighe v. Go Shelk Cab Corp., 27 A.D.2d 941, 281 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 22, 1966, reversed, without costs, and defendant Clifford’s motion to dismiss the complaint as to her, for want of prosecution, and for severance of the action as to her granted, without costs. Plaintiffs offered no justification for unreasonably neglecting to proceed in the action; nor did they submit an affidavit of merits in opposition to the motion. There is no merit to plaintiffs’ contention that the service of the 45-day notice within the six-month period following the date of joinder of issue was ineffective (Vercesi v. Lucas, 26 A D 2d 550). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 22, 1966, reversed, without costs, and defendant Clifford’s motion to dismiss the complaint as to her, for want of prosecution, and for severance of the action as to her granted, without costs. Plaintiffs offered no justification for unreasonably neglecting to proceed in the action; nor did they submit an affidavit of merits in opposition to the motion. There is no merit to plaintiffs’ contention that the service of the 45-day notice within the six-month period following the date of joinder of issue was ineffective (Vercesi v. Lucas, 26 A D 2d 550). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 941, 281 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tighe-v-go-shelk-cab-corp-nyappdiv-1967.