Tighe v. C. Raimondo & Son Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tighe v. C. Raimondo & Son Construction Co.

298 A.D.2d 578, 748 N.Y.S.2d 700, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10234

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 298 A.D.2d 578 (Tighe v. C. Raimondo & Son Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tighe v. C. Raimondo & Son Construction Co., 298 A.D.2d 578, 748 N.Y.S.2d 700, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the second fourth-party defendant Selective Insurance Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated June 12, 2001, as denied those branches of its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) which were to dismiss the second fourth-party complaint, seeking a judgment declaring that it was obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant third-party plaintiff, second third-party plaintiff, and second fourth-party plaintiff, Raimondo Contracting Corp., in the main action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Issues of fact exist and must be resolved, before the question of the appellant’s obligations can be determined. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the second fourth-party defendant Selective Insurance Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated June 12, 2001, as denied those branches of its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) which were to dismiss the second fourth-party complaint, seeking a judgment declaring that it was obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant third-party plaintiff, second third-party plaintiff, and second fourth-party plaintiff, Raimondo Contracting Corp., in the main action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Issues of fact exist and must be resolved, before the question of the appellant’s obligations can be determined. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 A.D.2d 578, 748 N.Y.S.2d 700, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tighe-v-c-raimondo-son-construction-co-nyappdiv-2002.