Tighe E. Woods, Housing Expediter v. Edward E. Garlits, Jr.

180 F.2d 752, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2496
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 21, 1950·No. 10061·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the briefs, the record and the oral argument in this case and we have concluded that except in one particular the decree of the court below should ,'be affirmed. Subparagraph “2” of the third paragraph of the order is too broad in view of our decision in Woods, Housing Expediter, v. Polis, 3 Cir., 180 F.2d 4, as amended March 13, 1950. Consequently the subparagraph referred to will be stricken from the decree entered by the court below on July 18, 1949. In all other respects the decree will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tighe E. Woods, Housing Expediter v. Edward E. Garlits, Jr., 180 F.2d 752, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2496 (3d Cir. 1950).

180 F.2d 752 (Tighe E. Woods, Housing Expediter v. Edward E. Garlits, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woods v. Polis
180 F.2d 4 (Third Circuit, 1950)