Tiggs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tiggs v. State

522 So. 2d 85, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 729, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1029, 1988 WL 21015

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 16, 1988

DocketNo. 87-2487

StatusPublished

This text of 522 So. 2d 85 (Tiggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tiggs v. State, 522 So. 2d 85, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 729, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1029, 1988 WL 21015 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We disagree with the trial court’s conclusion that appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief fails to allege with particularity any facts upon which relief could be granted. Therefore we reverse the order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief and we remand this cause and direct the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the merits of appellant’s motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We disagree with the trial court’s conclusion that appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief fails to allege with particularity any facts upon which relief could be granted. Therefore we reverse the order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief and we remand this cause and direct the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the merits of appellant’s motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

522 So. 2d 85, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 729, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1029, 1988 WL 21015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiggs-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.