Tiggs v. County of San Joaquin

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMay 25, 2023
Docket2:22-cv-02163
StatusUnknown

This text of Tiggs v. County of San Joaquin (Tiggs v. County of San Joaquin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tiggs v. County of San Joaquin, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1||\PORTER SCOTT 2 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494 3 || ctessenden@porterscott.com Suli A. Mastorakos, SBN 330383 4 || smastorakos@porterscott.com 350 University Ave., Suite 200 5 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 6 || FAX: 916.927.3706 7 || Attorneys for Defendant g COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN Exempt from Filing Fees Pursuant to Government Code § 6103 Sanjay S. Schmidt (SBN 247475) 10 |} LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY SCHMIDT 1388 Sutter Street, Suite 810 11 San Francisco, CA 94109 12 || T: (415) 563-85-83 F: (415) 223-9717 13 ss@sanjayschmidtlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 || AISHA JAMILAH TIGGS, individually and No. 2:22-cv-2163 KJM DB as co-successor in interest to Decedent 18 |] MARCUS CRUMB, M.T.C., Jr., a minor, by STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 19 || and through his proposed guardian ad litem, AISHA JAMILAH TIGGS, individually and 20 co-successor in interest to Decedent MARCUS CRUMB, N.C., a minor by and 21 through his proposed guardian ad litem, 92 || SEQUOIA BROWN, individually and as co- successor in interest to Decedent MARCUS 23 |} CRUMB, MYKEAL CRUMB, individually and co-successor in interest to Decedent 24 || MARCUS CRUMB, SIMON McCORMICK, 25 || JR., individually and as co-successor in interest to Decedent MARCUS CRUMB, and 26 ||ROES 1-20, individually and co- 7 successors in interest to Decedent MARCUS CRUMB, 28 Plaintiffs,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 v. 2 COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, a public 3 entity, San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Office employees DOES 1-30, individually, and 4 DOES 31-50, Jointly and Severally, 5 Defendants. 6 ___________________________________/ 7 8 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 9 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, 10 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for 11 any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 12 stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 13 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 14 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 15 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The 16 parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does 17 not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that 18 must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to 19 file material under seal. 20 2. DEFINITIONS 21 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or 22 items under this Order. 23 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, 24 stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 26(c). 26 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 27 their support staff). 28 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 1 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or 3 manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 4 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery 5 in this matter. 6 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 7 litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant 8 in this action. 9 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel does 10 not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 11 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity 12 not named as a Party to this action. 13 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but 14 are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that 15 party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 16 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 17 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 18 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in 19 this action. 20 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., 21 photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or 22 retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 23 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 24 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 25 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing 26 Party. 27 3. SCOPE 28 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 1 defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, 2 excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 3 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections 4 conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that 5 is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain 6 after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, 7 including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known 8 to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from 9 a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the 10 Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or 11 order. 12 4. DURATION 13 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order 14 shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise 15 directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this 16 action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all 17 appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any 18 motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 19 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 20 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non- 21 Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such 22 designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must 23 designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications 24 that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which 25 protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tiggs v. County of San Joaquin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiggs-v-county-of-san-joaquin-caed-2023.