Tiger v. Wilson
This text of 244 P. 30 (Tiger v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was originally commenced in the district court of Creek county, Okla., by Ada Tiger, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against William T. Wilson et al., defendants in error, defendants below, to recover an undivided one-fifth interest in lands in Creek county, Okla., described in the petition, together with damages for unlawfully withholding possession thereof.
This cause was tried upon the same evidence as cause No. 16234, Tiger v. Wildman,
Upon said issues, facts, and legal propositions applicable, the decision in the instant case must follow the decision in case No. 16234, supra, and the opinion in that case is adopted as the opinion in this case, and the syllabus of that case is also adopted, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed in part and reversed in part, under the same orders.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 P. 30, 116 Okla. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiger-v-wilson-okla-1926.