Tiger v. Spoonemoore
1931 OK 205, 5 P.2d 760, 148 Okla. 261, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 880
Opinion
In this case substantially the same state of facts is pleaded;as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Bealsey et al., No. 19939, *262 this (lay decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, and with which this case, together with others, was consolidated.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tiger v. Spoonemoore, 1931 OK 205, 5 P.2d 760, 148 Okla. 261, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 880 (Okla. 1931).
1931 OK 205 (Tiger v. Spoonemoore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
White Oak Refining Co. v. Whitehead
1931 OK 357 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
En-Le-Te-Ke v. Beasley
1931 OK 176 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)