Tigani v. Tigani
This text of Tigani v. Tigani (Tigani v. Tigani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
CHRISOPHER J. TIGANI, Sr., § § Plaintiff Below, § No. 190, 2021 Appellant, § § Court Below—Court of Chancery v. § of the State of Delaware § ROBERT F. TIGANI, Sr., Trustee § C.A. No. 2017-0786 and Individually, § § Defendant Below, § Appellee, § § and § § NKS DISTRIBUTORS, INC., a § Delaware corporation, § § Nominal Defendant-Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: November 19, 2021 Decided: January 25, 2022
Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs, the record on appeal, and the
appellant’s motion for oral argument, we have determined that oral argument is
unnecessary. We conclude that the judgment below of the Court of Chancery in its
post-trial opinion dated March 30, 2021 and its final order and judgment dated May
28, 2021 should be affirmed. Although we need not address every nuance of the complex record, the factual record and carefully detailed findings by the trial court
adequately support the conclusions of the Court of Chancery.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for oral argument is
DENIED and the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tigani v. Tigani, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tigani-v-tigani-del-2022.