TIG Insurance Company v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedSeptember 18, 2023
Docket7:21-cv-08975
StatusUnknown

This text of TIG Insurance Company v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corporation (TIG Insurance Company v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TIG Insurance Company v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor to RANGER INSURANCE COMPANY, and Case No.: 7:21-cv-08975-NSR-JCM ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC AND GAS INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED, CONFIDENTIALITY Plaintiffs, AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER -against - SWISS REINSURANCE AMERICA CORPORATION F/K/A NORTH AMERICAN REINSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendants. JUDITH C. McCARTHY, U.S.M.J.: WHEREAS, all of the parties to this action (collectively the “Parties” and individually a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Order will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: 1. With respect to “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action), recipients of Discovery Material may use such material solely for the prosecution and defense of this action and any appeals thereto, and not for any business, commercial, or competitive purpose or in any other litigation proceeding. Nothing contained in this Order, however, will affect or restrict the rights of any Party with respect to its own documents or information produced in this action. 2. With respect to Discovery Material that a party has designated as “Confidential”

pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as this Order expressly permits. 3. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (“Producing Party”) may designate as Confidential only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: a. previously non-disclosed financial information; b. competitively sensitive information; c. information subject to confidentiality agreements with third parties; d. information protected by or subject to statutory, regulatory or contractual protections, including privacy and cybersecurity regulations;

e. previously non-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non-public company; f. previously non-disclosed business plans, product-development information, or marketing plans; g. any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or h. any other category of information given confidential status by this Court after the date of this Order. 4. With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” by stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility.

5. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for “Confidential” information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential,” in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or its counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated

Confidential. 6. If, at any time before the termination of this action, a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated as Confidential some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously produced without limitation, the Producing Party may so designate such material by notifying the other Parties in writing. In addition, the Producing Party shall provide each other Party with replacement versions of such Discovery Material that bears the “Confidential” designation within two business days of providing such notice. Thereafter, the receiving Parties may disclose such information only as permitted by this Order. 7. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence. 8. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, other

persons subject to this Order may disclose such information only to the following persons: a. the Parties to this action, including employees, officers and directors of the Parties and of their corporate parents and affiliates, provided that such employees, officers and directors be instructed that such information is Confidential pursuant to this Order and may be disclosed only as permitted by this Order; b. counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this matter; c. outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and

document-management consultants) that counsel hires and assigns to this matter; d. any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; e. as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on the face of the document as having received a copy; f. any witness who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to testify at trial or deposition in this action; g. any person a Party retains to serve as an expert witness or otherwise provide specialized advice to counsel in connection with this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto;

h. stenographers engaged to transcribe depositions the Parties conduct in this action; and i. this Court, including any appellate court, its support personnel, and court reporters. 9. Counsel must retain each signed Non-Disclosure Agreement obtained pursuant to subparagraph 8(g) and produce it to opposing counsel either before such person is permitted to testify (at deposition or trial) or at the conclusion of the case, whichever comes first. 10. This Order binds the Parties and other persons specified in subparagraphs 8(b), 8(d) and 8(g) to treat as Confidential any Discovery Materials so classified. The Court has not, however, made any finding regarding the confidentiality of any Discovery Materials, and retains

full discretion to determine whether to afford confidential treatment to any Discovery Material designated as Confidential and submitted to the Court in connection with any motion, application, or proceeding that may result in an order and/or decision by the Court. All persons are hereby placed on notice that the Court is unlikely to seal or otherwise afford confidential treatment to any Discovery Material introduced into evidence at trial, even if such material has previously been sealed or designated as Confidential. 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
TIG Insurance Company v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tig-insurance-company-v-swiss-reinsurance-america-corporation-nysd-2023.