TIG Ins. Co. v. Wagner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

TIG Ins. Co. v. Wagner

707 So. 2d 945, 1998 WL 191167

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 18, 1998

Docket97-3389

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 707 So. 2d 945 (TIG Ins. Co. v. Wagner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

TIG Ins. Co. v. Wagner, 707 So. 2d 945, 1998 WL 191167 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

707 So.2d 945 (1998)

TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
Stephen J. WAGNER, Bernice Moskowitz, the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, a foreign corporation, and Equitable Variable Life Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Respondents.

No. 97-3389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 18, 1998.

Geralyn M. Passaro of Peters, Robertson, Lax, Parsons, Welcher, Mowers & Passaro, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Steven M. Katzman and Robert J. Hauser of Tew & Beasley, L.L.P., West Palm Beach, for respondent Stephen J. Wagner.

KLEIN, Judge.

Petitioner insurer seeks certiorari from an order abating its declaratory action seeking to determine coverage. We have jurisdiction. Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. Central Jersey Invs., Inc., 632 So.2d 138 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (trial court departed from essential requirements of law, and insurer had no adequate remedy on appeal from final judgment, where trial court abated declaratory action to determine coverage pending outcome of tort case).

In the present case the insurer is contesting coverage based on lack of notice, an issue which is not involved in the tort action, and if that issue were resolved in favor of the insurer it would have no duty to defend the tort case. We conclude, under Britamco and Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Ridenour, 629 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in granting the motion to abate, and that the insurer will have no remedy on appeal from final judgment. We therefore quash the order granting the motion to abate so that the declaratory action can proceed on the issue of whether the insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify because of lack of notice.

WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

707 So.2d 945 (1998)

TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
Stephen J. WAGNER, Bernice Moskowitz, the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, a foreign corporation, and Equitable Variable Life Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Respondents.

No. 97-3389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 18, 1998.

Geralyn M. Passaro of Peters, Robertson, Lax, Parsons, Welcher, Mowers & Passaro, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Steven M. Katzman and Robert J. Hauser of Tew & Beasley, L.L.P., West Palm Beach, for respondent Stephen J. Wagner.

KLEIN, Judge.

Petitioner insurer seeks certiorari from an order abating its declaratory action seeking to determine coverage. We have jurisdiction. Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. Central Jersey Invs., Inc., 632 So.2d 138 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (trial court departed from essential requirements of law, and insurer had no adequate remedy on appeal from final judgment, where trial court abated declaratory action to determine coverage pending outcome of tort case).

In the present case the insurer is contesting coverage based on lack of notice, an issue which is not involved in the tort action, and if that issue were resolved in favor of the insurer it would have no duty to defend the tort case. We conclude, under Britamco and Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Ridenour, 629 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in granting the motion to abate, and that the insurer will have no remedy on appeal from final judgment. We therefore quash the order granting the motion to abate so that the declaratory action can proceed on the issue of whether the insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify because of lack of notice.

WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

707 So. 2d 945, 1998 WL 191167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tig-ins-co-v-wagner-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Stephen J. WAGNER, Bernice Moskowitz, the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, a foreign corporation, and Equitable Variable Life Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Respondents.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
Stephen J. WAGNER, Bernice Moskowitz, the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, a foreign corporation, and Equitable Variable Life Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Respondents.