Tift v. Savannah, F. & W. Ry. Co

30 S.E. 266, 103 Ga. 580, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 194
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 30 S.E. 266 (Tift v. Savannah, F. & W. Ry. Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tift v. Savannah, F. & W. Ry. Co, 30 S.E. 266, 103 Ga. 580, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 194 (Ga. 1898).

Opinion

Little, J.

A deed which conveyed to a railroad company, “with the accompanying conditions and reservations,” rights of way over various parcels of land, and two described lots ‘ ‘ for depot purposes, ’ ’ and then specified certain conditions as to the width, manner of laying out, and locations of the rights of way, and certain reservations as to the use of the same for streets, etc., etc., passed to the grantee an absolute title to the two lots mentioned, which was not qualified or affected by the use of the words “for depot purposes” following the description of these two lots, nor by the use of the words “ with the accompanying conditions and res[581]*581ervations” in the beginning of the deed. The words last quoted-related exclusively to conditions and reservations respecting the rights of way.

Argued January 28, Decided March 3, 1898. Claim. Before Judge Spence. Dougherty superior court. April term, 1897. Wooten & Wooten, for plaintiffs in error. Erwin, duBignon, Chisholm, & Clay, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Transportation v. Knight
232 S.E.2d 72 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Jackson v. Rogers
54 S.E.2d 132 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Heyward v. Hatfield
185 S.E. 519 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Rogers v. Pitchford
184 S.E. 623 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Hollomon v. Board of Education
147 S.E. 882 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Samuel Mitchell Estate Inc. v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
146 S.E. 556 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Lawson v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.
82 S.E. 233 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 S.E. 266, 103 Ga. 580, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tift-v-savannah-f-w-ry-co-ga-1898.