Tift v. Savannah, F. & W. Ry. Co
This text of 30 S.E. 266 (Tift v. Savannah, F. & W. Ry. Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A deed which conveyed to a railroad company, “with the accompanying conditions and reservations,” rights of way over various parcels of land, and two described lots ‘ ‘ for depot purposes, ’ ’ and then specified certain conditions as to the width, manner of laying out, and locations of the rights of way, and certain reservations as to the use of the same for streets, etc., etc., passed to the grantee an absolute title to the two lots mentioned, which was not qualified or affected by the use of the words “for depot purposes” following the description of these two lots, nor by the use of the words “ with the accompanying conditions and res[581]*581ervations” in the beginning of the deed. The words last quoted-related exclusively to conditions and reservations respecting the rights of way.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 S.E. 266, 103 Ga. 580, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tift-v-savannah-f-w-ry-co-ga-1898.