Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Tift v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

Tift v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

110 S.E.2d 440, 100 Ga. App. 185, 1959 Ga. App. LEXIS 565
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 15, 1959
Docket37775
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E.2d 440 (Tift v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tift v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 110 S.E.2d 440, 100 Ga. App. 185, 1959 Ga. App. LEXIS 565 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

The defendant sued out a direct bill of exceptions to this court wherein the sole assignment of error was that the defendant excepted to the verdict directed for the plaintiff as being erroneous and contrary to law. Under such record there is no question presented for determination by this court and the writ of error must be dismissed. See Hamilton Nat. Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 (171 S. E. 293); Baker v. Decatur Lumber & Supply Co., 211 Ga. 510, 513 (87 S. E. 2d 89); and Woodall v. McCurry, 54 Ga. App. 437 (2) (188 S. E. 270) and citations therein. WHt of error dismissed. Toivnsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. Decatur Lumber & Supply Co.
87 S.E.2d 89 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Hamilton National Bank v. Robertson
171 S.E. 293 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Woodall v. McCurry
188 S.E. 270 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E.2d 440, 100 Ga. App. 185, 1959 Ga. App. LEXIS 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tift-v-cooper-tire-rubber-co-gactapp-1959.