Tift v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Tift v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

110 S.E.2d 440, 100 Ga. App. 185, 1959 Ga. App. LEXIS 565

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 15, 1959·No. 37775·Published

Opinion

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

The defendant sued out a direct bill of exceptions to this court wherein the sole assignment of error was that the defendant excepted to the verdict directed for the plaintiff as being erroneous and contrary to law. Under such record there is no question presented for determination by this court and the writ of error must be dismissed. See Hamilton Nat. Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 (171 S. E. 293); Baker v. Decatur Lumber & Supply Co., 211 Ga. 510, 513 (87 S. E. 2d 89); and Woodall v. McCurry, 54 Ga. App. 437 (2) (188 S. E. 270) and citations therein. WHt of error dismissed. Toivnsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

The defendant sued out a direct bill of exceptions to this court wherein the sole assignment of error was that the defendant excepted to the verdict directed for the plaintiff as being erroneous and contrary to law. Under such record there is no question presented for determination by this court and the writ of error must be dismissed. See Hamilton Nat. Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 (171 S. E. 293); Baker v. Decatur Lumber & Supply Co., 211 Ga. 510, 513 (87 S. E. 2d 89); and Woodall v. McCurry, 54 Ga. App. 437 (2) (188 S. E. 270) and citations therein. WHt of error dismissed. Toivnsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

Tift v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 110 S.E.2d 440, 100 Ga. App. 185, 1959 Ga. App. LEXIS 565 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

110 S.E.2d 440 (Tift v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related