Tifow v. Mukasey

Ninth Circuit

Tifow v. Mukasey

286 F. App'x 432

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 24, 2008

DocketNo. 04-76710

StatusPublished

This text of 286 F. App'x 432 (Tifow v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tifow v. Mukasey, 286 F. App'x 432 (9th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter is REMANDED to the Board of Immigration Appeals for further remand to the Immigration Judge for the limited purpose of allowing the Immigration Judge to explain why her written decision of July 28, 2003, varies from her oral decision of July 25, 2003. The explanation shall address in detail the Immigration Judge’s decisional process in this case and, specifically, shall also address why the oral decision ends abruptly. The Immigration Judge’s explanation shall be filed with the Clerk of Court in San Francisco, California, no later than Friday, August 22, 2008.

This panel shall retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter is REMANDED to the Board of Immigration Appeals for further remand to the Immigration Judge for the limited purpose of allowing the Immigration Judge to explain why her written decision of July 28, 2003, varies from her oral decision of July 25, 2003. The explanation shall address in detail the Immigration Judge’s decisional process in this case and, specifically, shall also address why the oral decision ends abruptly. The Immigration Judge’s explanation shall be filed with the Clerk of Court in San Francisco, California, no later than Friday, August 22, 2008.

This panel shall retain jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 F. App'x 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tifow-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.