Tiffiney Cottledge v. James Roberson, D/B/A Roberson`s Remodeling and Roofing

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________

No. 06-11-00111-CV ______________________________

TIFFINEY COTTLEDGE, Appellant

V.

JAMES ROBERSON, D/B/A ROBERSON’S REMODELING AND ROOFING, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court No. 10-13682

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss MEMORANDUM OPINION

Tiffiney Cottledge, appellant, filed her notice of appeal1 July 28, 2011.

Cottledge is not indigent. Therefore, Cottledge is responsible for payment of the clerk’s

record, reporter’s record, and filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. app. C (B)(1); 20.1.

The clerk’s record was due on or before November 8, 2011. There is no information to

indicate Cottledge has made efforts to have the clerk’s record filed with this Court. Further,

Cottledge has not paid the filing fee. On December 8, 2011, we contacted Cottledge by letter,

giving her an opportunity to cure the various defects, and warning her that, if we did not receive an

adequate response within ten days, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

We have received no communication from Cottledge. Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),

we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice

Date Submitted: January 4, 2012 Date Decided: January 5, 2012

1 Originally appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2005). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Twelfth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.