Tiffer v. Workers Compensation

Opinion

----------------·--··~---····--·-· t,.• r ~ ,. ..__ , .1 .... r:: . 'j(J11 ..: 1 20 2 '. .. Clerk, ·~: . C is! ict 1 la k 1ptcy Courts\ th1 D1 ;tric ~Jt :0 Jmbia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ROMAN TIFFER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12 1260 I ) '

WORKERS COMPENSATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

It appears that the plaintiff seeks review of a Maryland administrative agency de ision

denying his claim for worker's compensation benefits arising from an injury plaintiff all gedly

sustained on November 18, 2006, while he was working as a security guard. It further a pears

that the plaintiff unsuccessfully sought judicial review of the agency decision in the Unit d

States District Court for the District of Maryland. See Ti.ffer v. Workers Compensation, o. 09-

1550,2009 WL 6891646, at *1 (D. Md. June 19, 2009), aff'd, 332 Fed. App'x 108 (4th

2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 1069 (201 0). Neither review of the Maryland administrat ve

agency's decision, see Tiffer, 2009 WL 6891646, at* 1 (citing Md. Code Ann., Labor an

Employment§ 9-737), nor review of another federal court's decision, see 28 U.S.C. §§ 254,

1291, is properly before this Court. The plaintiffs application to proceed in forma paupf!ris will

be granted, and his pro se complaint will be dismissed.

An Order accompanies this Memoran

DATE:1\. '){)~ \~