Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation
This text of 511 F. App'x 269 (Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Roman Tiffer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action seeking reversal of a state court judgment. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Tiffer’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Tiffer has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
511 F. App'x 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiffer-v-workers-compensation-ca4-2013.