Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation

511 F. App'x 269
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 2013
DocketNo. 13-1001
StatusPublished

This text of 511 F. App'x 269 (Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation, 511 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Roman Tiffer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action seeking reversal of a state court judgment. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Tiffer’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Tiffer has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 F. App'x 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiffer-v-workers-compensation-ca4-2013.