Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation

511 F. App'x 269
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2013·No. No. 13-1001·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Roman Tiffer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action seeking reversal of a state court judgment. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Tiffer’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Tiffer has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation, 511 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2013).

511 F. App'x 269 (Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.