Tiffany v. United States

65 F. 494, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3002
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tiffany v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 F. 736

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge

(after stating the facts). These are small statues cast front bronze, and touched up and made expressive by the hands of sculptors. The. tariff act of 1890 put a lower duty than was assessed on these statues on ‘‘such statuary as is cut, carved, or otherwise wrought by hand from a solid block or mass of marble, stone, or alabaster, or from metal, and is the professional production of a statuary or sculptor only.” These are claimed to be such statuary, because they are wrought somewhat by professional hands. But. the requirement that they should be wrought from metal by hand is very strict, and these statutes are wrought so slightly by hand that they do not now appear lo fairly come within it. The decision of the board of United States general appraisers is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tiffany v. United States, 65 F. 494, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3002 (circtsdny 1895).

65 F. 494 (Tiffany v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.