Tiffany v. Leet
181 A.D. 919
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1917·Published
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, but without prejudice to another application by plaintiffs upon proper papers to amend their complaint, if so advised, upon the authority of Quarantiello v. Grand Trunk R. Co. (145 App. Div. 138). All concurred; Lambert, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tiffany v. Leet, 181 A.D. 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
181 A.D. 919 (Tiffany v. Leet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quarantiello v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada
145 A.D. 138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)