Tiffany Thomas v. Beachwood City School District Board of Education
This text of Tiffany Thomas v. Beachwood City School District Board of Education (Tiffany Thomas v. Beachwood City School District Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
TIFFANY THOMAS, ) CASE NO. 1: 25 CV 2167 _ Plaintiff, JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT oy 5 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT ) AND RECOMMENDATION BEACHWOOD CITY SCHOOL ) . DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, __)
Defendant..
This matter comes before the Court upon the Report.and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J ames A. Grimes, Jr. (ECF #19) Magistrate Judge Grimes recommends that the Plaintiff’ s.
Motions for a Preliminary Injunction and for an evidentiary hearing be denied and that Defendant’s Motion to file supplemental documents in opposition to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction be granted. No obj ection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed.
The applicable standard of review of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation depends upon whether obj ections were made to that report. When obj ections are made to a report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court reviews the case de novo. FED R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). When no timely objection is filed, “the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error.on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s notes (citations omitted). See also, Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985)(‘‘It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of magistrate judge’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to these findings.”’)
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and agrees with the findings and analysis set forth therein. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Grimes (ECF #19) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF #3) and an evidentiary hearing (ECF #10) are denied.' IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONALD C. Nice United States District'Judge
DATED: | Wht 4 LOU Plaintiff has filed two objections that do not appear to seek a review of an Order issued by Magistrate Judge Grimes. See ECF ## 20 and 21. As such this Court will not address □□ them.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tiffany Thomas v. Beachwood City School District Board of Education, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiffany-thomas-v-beachwood-city-school-district-board-of-education-ohnd-2026.