Tiffany Roseman v. Y2f Ventures, LLC
This text of Tiffany Roseman v. Y2f Ventures, LLC (Tiffany Roseman v. Y2f Ventures, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ April 07, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A1601. TIFFANY ROSEMAN v. Y2F VENTURES, LLC.
This case originated in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, Tiffany Roseman filed a petition for review in superior court. The superior court dismissed the petition for review, and Roseman filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Because the underlying issue involves the superior court’s de novo review of a magistrate court ruling, Roseman was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures in order to appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(1); Greig v. Putnam County, 237 Ga. App. 57, 57 (513 SE2d 294) (1999). Roseman’s failure to comply with the requisite procedures deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/07/2026 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tiffany Roseman v. Y2f Ventures, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiffany-roseman-v-y2f-ventures-llc-gactapp-2026.