Tiffany Floyd v. Zifei Yang
This text of Tiffany Floyd v. Zifei Yang (Tiffany Floyd v. Zifei Yang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 25, 2023.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00065-CV
TIFFANY FLOYD, Appellant
V.
ZIFEI YANG, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 22-CCV-071874
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a judgment signed January 17, 2023. The notice of appeal was filed February 1, 2023. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.1
1 Although appellant’s notice of appeal states without elaborating that she “is indigent and would like to proceed without paying court cost[s],” this is not sufficient to excuse appellant from paying court costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(b) (“A party who cannot afford payment of court costs On March 7, 2023, notification was transmitted to appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless, within fifteen days, appellant made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response was filed to that notice.
On March 28, 2023, appellant was ordered to demonstrate she had made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record on or before April 7, 2023. In the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with either of those requirements would leave the appeal subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. Appellant has not filed any response demonstrating she has made arrangements to pay for the record. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Wilson.
must file the Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs approved by the Supreme Court or another sworn document containing the same information.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tiffany Floyd v. Zifei Yang, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiffany-floyd-v-zifei-yang-texapp-2023.