Cite as 2019 Ark. App. 571 Digitally signed by Elizabeth ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Perry DIVISION III Date: 2022.08.09 10:55:21 -05'00' No. CV-19-549 Adobe Acrobat version: 2022.001.20169 Opinion Delivered: December 4, 2019 TIFFANY CRAMER APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 72JV-19-62] V. HONORABLE STACEY ZIMMERMAN, JUDGE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AND MINOR CHILDREN
APPELLEES AFFIRMED
MEREDITH B. SWITZER, Judge
Tiffany Cramer appeals from the March 7 and April 18, 2019 orders adjudicating her
three children, BA, CA, and MC, dependent-neglected. As her sole point of appeal, she
challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the adjudication. We affirm.
Adjudication hearings are held to determine whether the allegations in a petition are
substantiated by the proof. Araujo v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 2019 Ark. App. 181, 574
S.W.3d 683. In reviewing a dependency-neglect adjudication, we defer to the circuit
court’s superior position to observe the parties and judge the credibility of the witnesses. Id.
We will not reverse the circuit court’s findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. A
finding is clearly erroneous when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing
court on the entire evidence is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has
been made. Id. A dependent-neglected juvenile includes any juvenile who is at substantial risk of
serious harm as a result of neglect or parental unfitness. Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-303(18)(A)
(Supp. 2017). The definition of neglect includes the failure to take reasonable action to
protect the juvenile from abuse, neglect, or parental unfitness when the existence of this
condition was known or should have been known. Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-303(36)(A)(iii).
An adjudication of dependency-neglect is an adjudication as to the juvenile, not the parent,
and occurs without reference to which parent committed the acts or omissions leading to
the adjudication; the juvenile is simply dependent-neglected. Araujo, supra.
On January 11, 2019, Tiffany left BA, CA, and JA at her mother’s house so that her
mother, Joanne Hostetter, and her sister, Melissa Cramer, could babysit them. Joanne shared
the house with Melissa, and Joanne’s boyfriend, Carroll Tilton, also lived there. In addition,
Joanne had guardianship over Tiffany’s other child, MC, as well as two other children, MD
and HK. The Washington County Sheriff’s Department responded to a call that night
because Joanne and Melissa had left the minor children, MD, BA, CA, and JA, alone at the
house. In addition to inadequate supervision, the resulting investigation found the home
was not suitable for children because of unsecured prescription bottles within the children’s
reach and unsanitary conditions. It was eventually determined that BA, CA, and JA were
Tiffany’s children and that they resided in her house, not Joanne’s. Consequently, Tiffany’s
house was also inspected. It was found to be appropriate. BA, CA, and JA were returned
to Tiffany, but she was instructed not to allow Joanne and Melissa to supervise them. MC,
Tiffany’s other biological child, was not released to Tiffany because Joanne was still her legal
guardian.
2 The Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) continued its hold on MC,
MD, and HK and developed a written protection plan for the children. The plan required
Joanne and Melissa to lock the medications in a safe, to correct the sanitary problems in the
house, and to develop a caregiver plan for the children when they were at work. DHS
returned to the home on January 14, 2019, to inspect the health and safety conditions; they
found compliance and returned MD, HK, and MC to the home.
On January 23, 2019, JA was found unresponsive while at Joanne’s house. She was
transported to the local hospital where she tested positive for high levels of oxycodone. She
was then taken to Arkansas Children’s Hospital (ACH) where she was given a fatal
prognosis. DHS was notified of these events on January 24. The resulting inspection of
Joanne’s house revealed many prescription pill bottles in Joanne’s bedroom, which is where
JA had been found unresponsive. Joanne shared the bedroom with her boyfriend, Tilton.
A second seventy-two-hour hold was placed on all the children, but JA died the next day—
January 25. A petition for emergency custody and dependency-neglect with respect to BA,
CA, and MC was filed on January 28 and granted the next day. The probable-cause order
was filed on February 1, 2019, and the trial court specifically found that Tiffany had returned
her children to Joanne’s house after DHS instructed her not to do so; that the poor parenting
choice placed her children in a harmful situation and ultimately resulted in JA’s death; that
even though she did not own or reside in the home and was not present when JA became
unresponsive, it was still her obligation to protect her children; that she tested positive for
benzos and THC on January 11; and that DHS never should have returned the children to
her or Joanne.
3 The adjudication hearing was held on April 10, 2019. The court heard testimony
from the treating pediatrician at ACH. She explained that JA’s urine screen from the first
hospital was positive for high levels of oxycodone and that her hair-follicle test from ACH
was positive for THC. The pediatrician opined that the only explanation for JA’s sudden
death was the high level of oxycodone, which was 200 times the recommended therapeutic
amount for an adult and caused JA to stop breathing and her heart to stop beating. Tiffany
and Joanne denied the presence of oxycodone in Joanne’s house.
The family-service worker (FSW) testified that she told Tiffany that Joanne and
Melissa were not appropriate caretakers for her children when they were released back to
Tiffany following the January 11 incident. The FSW visited Joanne’s house after JA had
been found unresponsive. She found prescription pill bottles “all over” Joanne’s bedroom—
on the shelves, night stands, drawers—and that was the room where JA had been found.
The FSW’s supervisor testified she also specifically told Tiffany that Melissa and
Joanne could no longer babysit her children because they were both seeing a pain-
management doctor, and an alarming amount of prescription medications were left within
the children’s reach throughout the house. Tiffany identified other individuals who could
babysit her children, and those individuals were approved by DHS because they had no
prior negative history with DHS.
The investigator for the Arkansas State Police Crimes Against Children Division
testified that after he had been notified about JA’s condition on January 24, he visited
Joanne’s house. He said that Melissa, BA, MC, and CA were the only persons present. He
interviewed MC and Melissa, who told him the only medication JA had taken the night she
4 was found unresponsive was Tylenol for ear pain. They also stated JA had fallen asleep in
the living room, and they moved her to Joanne’s bedroom sometime between 9:30 and
10:30 p.m. At approximately 1:00 a.m., Joanne realized JA was not responsive and took
her to the hospital. The investigator found prescription pill bottles on shelves and side
tables, along with “random blank white pills” scattered on the floor.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite as 2019 Ark. App. 571 Digitally signed by Elizabeth ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Perry DIVISION III Date: 2022.08.09 10:55:21 -05'00' No. CV-19-549 Adobe Acrobat version: 2022.001.20169 Opinion Delivered: December 4, 2019 TIFFANY CRAMER APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 72JV-19-62] V. HONORABLE STACEY ZIMMERMAN, JUDGE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AND MINOR CHILDREN
APPELLEES AFFIRMED
MEREDITH B. SWITZER, Judge
Tiffany Cramer appeals from the March 7 and April 18, 2019 orders adjudicating her
three children, BA, CA, and MC, dependent-neglected. As her sole point of appeal, she
challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the adjudication. We affirm.
Adjudication hearings are held to determine whether the allegations in a petition are
substantiated by the proof. Araujo v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 2019 Ark. App. 181, 574
S.W.3d 683. In reviewing a dependency-neglect adjudication, we defer to the circuit
court’s superior position to observe the parties and judge the credibility of the witnesses. Id.
We will not reverse the circuit court’s findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. A
finding is clearly erroneous when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing
court on the entire evidence is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has
been made. Id. A dependent-neglected juvenile includes any juvenile who is at substantial risk of
serious harm as a result of neglect or parental unfitness. Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-303(18)(A)
(Supp. 2017). The definition of neglect includes the failure to take reasonable action to
protect the juvenile from abuse, neglect, or parental unfitness when the existence of this
condition was known or should have been known. Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-303(36)(A)(iii).
An adjudication of dependency-neglect is an adjudication as to the juvenile, not the parent,
and occurs without reference to which parent committed the acts or omissions leading to
the adjudication; the juvenile is simply dependent-neglected. Araujo, supra.
On January 11, 2019, Tiffany left BA, CA, and JA at her mother’s house so that her
mother, Joanne Hostetter, and her sister, Melissa Cramer, could babysit them. Joanne shared
the house with Melissa, and Joanne’s boyfriend, Carroll Tilton, also lived there. In addition,
Joanne had guardianship over Tiffany’s other child, MC, as well as two other children, MD
and HK. The Washington County Sheriff’s Department responded to a call that night
because Joanne and Melissa had left the minor children, MD, BA, CA, and JA, alone at the
house. In addition to inadequate supervision, the resulting investigation found the home
was not suitable for children because of unsecured prescription bottles within the children’s
reach and unsanitary conditions. It was eventually determined that BA, CA, and JA were
Tiffany’s children and that they resided in her house, not Joanne’s. Consequently, Tiffany’s
house was also inspected. It was found to be appropriate. BA, CA, and JA were returned
to Tiffany, but she was instructed not to allow Joanne and Melissa to supervise them. MC,
Tiffany’s other biological child, was not released to Tiffany because Joanne was still her legal
guardian.
2 The Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) continued its hold on MC,
MD, and HK and developed a written protection plan for the children. The plan required
Joanne and Melissa to lock the medications in a safe, to correct the sanitary problems in the
house, and to develop a caregiver plan for the children when they were at work. DHS
returned to the home on January 14, 2019, to inspect the health and safety conditions; they
found compliance and returned MD, HK, and MC to the home.
On January 23, 2019, JA was found unresponsive while at Joanne’s house. She was
transported to the local hospital where she tested positive for high levels of oxycodone. She
was then taken to Arkansas Children’s Hospital (ACH) where she was given a fatal
prognosis. DHS was notified of these events on January 24. The resulting inspection of
Joanne’s house revealed many prescription pill bottles in Joanne’s bedroom, which is where
JA had been found unresponsive. Joanne shared the bedroom with her boyfriend, Tilton.
A second seventy-two-hour hold was placed on all the children, but JA died the next day—
January 25. A petition for emergency custody and dependency-neglect with respect to BA,
CA, and MC was filed on January 28 and granted the next day. The probable-cause order
was filed on February 1, 2019, and the trial court specifically found that Tiffany had returned
her children to Joanne’s house after DHS instructed her not to do so; that the poor parenting
choice placed her children in a harmful situation and ultimately resulted in JA’s death; that
even though she did not own or reside in the home and was not present when JA became
unresponsive, it was still her obligation to protect her children; that she tested positive for
benzos and THC on January 11; and that DHS never should have returned the children to
her or Joanne.
3 The adjudication hearing was held on April 10, 2019. The court heard testimony
from the treating pediatrician at ACH. She explained that JA’s urine screen from the first
hospital was positive for high levels of oxycodone and that her hair-follicle test from ACH
was positive for THC. The pediatrician opined that the only explanation for JA’s sudden
death was the high level of oxycodone, which was 200 times the recommended therapeutic
amount for an adult and caused JA to stop breathing and her heart to stop beating. Tiffany
and Joanne denied the presence of oxycodone in Joanne’s house.
The family-service worker (FSW) testified that she told Tiffany that Joanne and
Melissa were not appropriate caretakers for her children when they were released back to
Tiffany following the January 11 incident. The FSW visited Joanne’s house after JA had
been found unresponsive. She found prescription pill bottles “all over” Joanne’s bedroom—
on the shelves, night stands, drawers—and that was the room where JA had been found.
The FSW’s supervisor testified she also specifically told Tiffany that Melissa and
Joanne could no longer babysit her children because they were both seeing a pain-
management doctor, and an alarming amount of prescription medications were left within
the children’s reach throughout the house. Tiffany identified other individuals who could
babysit her children, and those individuals were approved by DHS because they had no
prior negative history with DHS.
The investigator for the Arkansas State Police Crimes Against Children Division
testified that after he had been notified about JA’s condition on January 24, he visited
Joanne’s house. He said that Melissa, BA, MC, and CA were the only persons present. He
interviewed MC and Melissa, who told him the only medication JA had taken the night she
4 was found unresponsive was Tylenol for ear pain. They also stated JA had fallen asleep in
the living room, and they moved her to Joanne’s bedroom sometime between 9:30 and
10:30 p.m. At approximately 1:00 a.m., Joanne realized JA was not responsive and took
her to the hospital. The investigator found prescription pill bottles on shelves and side
tables, along with “random blank white pills” scattered on the floor.
Detective John Schuster testified that on March 5, 2019, Joanne and Melissa were
arrested and charged with the offense of first-degree felony endangering the welfare of a
minor. He said that Joanne changed her previous versions of events several times during
her interview. Also, Joanne told Schuster that Tiffany constantly left the children with her
and that Joanne and Melissa were under investigation for drugs being sold out of their home.
Tiffany testified that she was not participating in the court-ordered counseling; she
was on probation for aggravated assault and delivery of methamphetamine; she had incurred
new charges in March for possession of controlled substances and drug paraphernalia; she
missed a drug screen on April 5, 2019; and all her other drug screens had been positive for
THC and benzos. She confirmed that she knew why the children had been removed on
January 11 and that DHS had told her she needed to find a new babysitter for her children.
She further admitted that she knew even before the January 11 incident that Joanne and
Melissa left prescription drug bottles throughout their house within reach of the children.
She further testified that Tilton, Joanne’s boyfriend, had sexually assaulted her when she
lived in the house. She tried to justify her decision to leave the children with Joanne after
the January 11 incident, explaining that her kids would never take pills and that because
DHS had returned MC, MD, and HK to Joanne’s care, she felt it was safe. Tiffany’s timeline
5 for her quick trip to Florida, which she said necessitated her leaving JA with Joanne, was
confusing at best, and it conflicted with the timelines and explanations contained in JA’s
medical records.
The trial court found all the juveniles—Tiffany’s biological children and the children
in Joanne’s custody—dependent-neglected. Tiffany appeals the order of adjudication
alleging that the children were not at substantial risk of serious harm as a result of neglect or
parental unfitness. We find no clear error.
There was sufficient evidence in the record to support a finding that Tiffany knew
the juveniles would be at a substantial risk of serious harm if left in Joanne and Melissa’s care
in their home. Tiffany knew—before and after the January 11 incident—that Joanne’s
house had a lot of prescription pills lying around within the children’s reach, and that after
the January 11 incident, DHS told her not to let Joanne and Melissa babysit the
children. She also knew Tilton, who had previously sexually assaulted her, was still living
in the house and would have contact with the children. The evidence also showed that
Tiffany had her own drug issues, and frequently left the children with Joanne and Melissa
despite the fact that Joanne and Melissa were under investigation for selling drugs out of
their house. Tiffany attempted to justify leaving her children with Joanne and Melissa by
stating she was confident that her kids would not take any of the pills and reasoning that the
kids were not at risk of harm because DHS had returned the other children to Joanne’s
house. Her justification and reasoning are unpersuasive and flawed. We are not left with a
firm conviction that the trial court made a mistake here.
6 Affirmed.
VAUGHT and MURPHY, JJ., agree.
Tabitha McNulty, Arkansas Commission for Parent Counsel, for appellant.
Ellen K. Howard, Office of Chief Counsel, for appellee.
Chrestman Group, PLLC, by: Keith L. Chrestman, attorney ad litem for minor
children.