Tiffany & Co. v. Starzman
194 A. 163, 118 N.J.L. 564, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 319
This text of 194 A. 163 (Tiffany & Co. v. Starzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tiffany & Co. v. Starzman, 194 A. 163, 118 N.J.L. 564, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 319 (N.J. 1937).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bates v. Asbury Iron & Bridge Works, Inc.
33 A.2d 692 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1943)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
194 A. 163, 118 N.J.L. 564, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tiffany-co-v-starzman-nj-1937.