Tiffany & Co. v. Starzman
194 A. 163, 118 N.J.L. 564, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 319
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tiffany & Co. v. Starzman, 194 A. 163, 118 N.J.L. 564, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 319 (N.J. 1937).
194 A. 163 (Tiffany & Co. v. Starzman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bates v. Asbury Iron & Bridge Works, Inc.
33 A.2d 692 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1943)