Tietjen v. Wingate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tietjen v. Wingate

244 A.D. 806

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 244 A.D. 806 (Tietjen v. Wingate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tietjen v. Wingate, 244 A.D. 806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for. an alternative order of prohibition directed to the surrogate of the county of Kings and commanding him to refrain from proceeding further with respect to the vacating of an order confirming an adoption denied in the exercise of discretion. Should the surrogate’s decision be adverse to the moving party, he can bring the question up on an abridged record, as pointed out in Capone v. Matteo Realty Corporation (241 App. Div. 845). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for. an alternative order of prohibition directed to the surrogate of the county of Kings and commanding him to refrain from proceeding further with respect to the vacating of an order confirming an adoption denied in the exercise of discretion. Should the surrogate’s decision be adverse to the moving party, he can bring the question up on an abridged record, as pointed out in Capone v. Matteo Realty Corporation (241 App. Div. 845). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D. 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tietjen-v-wingate-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack