Tietjen v. Wingate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tietjen v. Wingate

244 A.D. 806

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Motion for. an alternative order of prohibition directed to the surrogate of the county of Kings and commanding him to refrain from proceeding further with respect to the vacating of an order confirming an adoption denied in the exercise of discretion. Should the surrogate’s decision be adverse to the moving party, he can bring the question up on an abridged record, as pointed out in Capone v. Matteo Realty Corporation (241 App. Div. 845). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for. an alternative order of prohibition directed to the surrogate of the county of Kings and commanding him to refrain from proceeding further with respect to the vacating of an order confirming an adoption denied in the exercise of discretion. Should the surrogate’s decision be adverse to the moving party, he can bring the question up on an abridged record, as pointed out in Capone v. Matteo Realty Corporation (241 App. Div. 845). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ,

Tietjen v. Wingate, 244 A.D. 806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

244 A.D. 806 (Tietjen v. Wingate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related