Tietig v. Department of Transportation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tietig v. Department of Transportation

276 So. 2d 97, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6871

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 28, 1973

DocketNo. 72-702

StatusPublished

This text of 276 So. 2d 97 (Tietig v. Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tietig v. Department of Transportation, 276 So. 2d 97, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6871 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A review of the recent cases discussing the criteria to be applied in determining the adequacy of the complaint compels us [98]*98to the conclusion that the complaint m the case sub judice contains sufficient allegations to state a cause of action against the defendants. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Walters, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 563; Iorio v. Layman, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 26; Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., Fla.App. 1971, 246 So.2d 631.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI