Tietig v. Department of Transportation

276 So. 2d 97, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6871
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 1973·No. No. 72-702·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A review of the recent cases discussing the criteria to be applied in determining the adequacy of the complaint compels us [98]*98to the conclusion that the complaint m the case sub judice contains sufficient allegations to state a cause of action against the defendants. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Walters, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 563; Iorio v. Layman, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 26; Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., Fla.App. 1971, 246 So.2d 631.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tietig v. Department of Transportation, 276 So. 2d 97, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6871 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

276 So. 2d 97 (Tietig v. Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Walters
246 So. 2d 563 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.
246 So. 2d 631 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Iorio v. Layman
256 So. 2d 26 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)