Tierney v. Whitestone Savings & Loan Ass'n
83 Misc. 2d 855, 373 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2999
Opinion
Memorandum. Judgment unanimously reversed without costs and complaint dismissed.
In the absence of either an express or implied provision, plaintiffs are not entitled to interest or earnings on the moneys paid into the tax account pursuant to the mortgage agreement (Matter of Surrey Strathmore Corp. v Dollar Sav. Bank of N. Y., 36 NY2d 173).
Concur — Groat, P. J., Pino and Rinaldi, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tierney v. Whitestone Savings & Loan Ass'n, 83 Misc. 2d 855, 373 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).
83 Misc. 2d 855 (Tierney v. Whitestone Savings & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gorham-Dimaggio v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
592 F. Supp. 2d 283 (N.D. New York, 2008)
Peoples Westchester Savings Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance
772 F. Supp. 738 (E.D. New York, 1991)
Buchanan v. Century Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
452 A.2d 540 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Doran v. Treiling (In Re Treiling)
21 B.R. 940 (E.D. New York, 1982)
Kronisch v. Howard Savings Institution
392 A.2d 178 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Frouge Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank (Nat. Ass'n)
426 F. Supp. 794 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Carpenter v. Suffolk Franklin Savings Bank
346 N.E.2d 892 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1976)