Tierney v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rail. Co.
49 N.E. 1100, 155 N.Y. 642, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 949
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Martin, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tierney v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rail. Co., 49 N.E. 1100, 155 N.Y. 642, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 949 (N.Y. 1898).
49 N.E. 1100 (Tierney v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rail. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.