Tierney v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rail. Co.
49 N.E. 1100, 155 N.Y. 642, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 949
This text of 49 N.E. 1100 (Tierney v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rail. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tierney v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rail. Co., 49 N.E. 1100, 155 N.Y. 642, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 949 (N.Y. 1898).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Martin, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 N.E. 1100, 155 N.Y. 642, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tierney-v-syracuse-binghamton-and-new-york-rail-co-ny-1898.