Tierney v. State

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 13, 2013·No. SCPW-13-0000095·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0000095 13-MAR-2013 01:41 PM

SCPW-13-000095

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner, vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (S.P.P. No. 12-1-0011)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C. Tierney’s motion for reconsideration of the February 21, 2013 order denying his “Motion for Appoin[t]ment of Counsel Demand by U.S. Supreme Court”, which was reviewed as a petition for a writ of mandamus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 13, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tierney v. State, (haw 2013).

Tierney v. State (Tierney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.