Tierney v. Schweigert
This text of Tierney v. Schweigert (Tierney v. Schweigert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000832 19-OCT-2012 10:55 AM NO. SCPW-12-0000832
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner,
vs.
JACK SCHWEIGERT, Court-Appointed Attorney, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 08-1-0869)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Petitioner Michael C. Tierney’s
petition for a writ of mandamus, the supporting documents, and
the record, it appears that on October 9, 2012, court-appointed
counsel, Jack Schweigert, filed a motion to withdraw as counsel
in Cr. No. 08-1-0869. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied as moot.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 19, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tierney v. Schweigert, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tierney-v-schweigert-haw-2012.