Tierney v. Sakai

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 9, 2012
DocketSCPW-12-0000799
StatusPublished

This text of Tierney v. Sakai (Tierney v. Sakai) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tierney v. Sakai, (haw 2012).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000799 09-OCT-2012 01:37 PM

NO. SCPW-12-0000799

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner,

vs.

TED SAKAI, INTERIM DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAI'I; SHARI KIMOTO; and JEANETTE BALTERO, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.,

with Acoba, J. dissenting)

Upon consideration of Michael C. Tierney’s September 19, 2012 petition for a writ of mandamus and the document submitted in support thereof and attached thereto, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to return to Hawai'i to serve the remainder of his sentence. See Malahoff v. Saito, 111 Hawai'i 168, 191, 140 P.3d 401, 424 (2006) (the term “shall” in a statute may be construed as directory rather than mandatory); Jack Endo Elec., Inc. v. Lear Siegler, Inc., 59 Haw. 612, 617, 585 P.2d 1265, 1269 (1978) (same). Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to

redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested

action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 9, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

DISSENT BY ACOBA, J.

I dissent to the denial of Petitioner Michael C.

Tierney’s petition for a writ of mandamus (Petition). I would

require Respondents Ted Sakai, Director of the Department of

Public Safety (DPS), Shari Kimoto, the mainland branch manager

for DPS, and Jeanette Baltero, the contract monitor for DPS to

file an answer to the Petition.

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

-2­

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kema v. Gaddis
982 P.2d 334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)
Malahoff v. Saito
140 P.3d 401 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2006)
Jack Endo Electric, Inc. v. Lear Siegler, Inc.
585 P.2d 1265 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tierney v. Sakai, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tierney-v-sakai-haw-2012.