Tierney v. Rotante
122 A. 925, 99 Conn. 731, 1923 Conn. LEXIS 149
This text of 122 A. 925 (Tierney v. Rotante) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tierney v. Rotante, 122 A. 925, 99 Conn. 731, 1923 Conn. LEXIS 149 (Colo. 1923).
Opinion
There was a fair conflict in the evidence as to how the accident occurred.
The verdict of the jury imported that it found in accordance with the plaintiff’s claim, as it had the right to do, and the evidence was such that it might reasonably have found that the defendant was negligent and that the plaintiff was in the exercise of due care.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
122 A. 925, 99 Conn. 731, 1923 Conn. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tierney-v-rotante-conn-1923.