Tierney v. Perkins
Opinion
NO. 30429
50=| Hd 6! .WWHBZ
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner, VS. THE HONORABLE RICHARD K. PERKINS, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAl‘I, ReSpondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(S.P.P. No. 10-1-OOl8)
ORDER C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy,
(By: Moon, and Recktenwald, JJ.) Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of
the hay 4, 2010 order denying the petition for a writ of
mandamus,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for
reconsideration is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUq May 19, 20l0.
+Xr,w.m of'r\ea-/_e).¢.¢ct/\v/~
N“~Ww
Q/.,...,_s. »‘du@q,,g\, A /720¢/» é`. &¢»L¢¢.,.,./»¢¢(
533 "H~.ri
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tierney v. Perkins (Tierney v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.