Tierney v. Perkins

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 19, 2010·No. 30429·Published

Opinion

NO. 30429

50=| Hd 6! .WWHBZ

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner, VS. THE HONORABLE RICHARD K. PERKINS, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAl‘I, ReSpondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(S.P.P. No. 10-1-OOl8)

ORDER C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy,

(By: Moon, and Recktenwald, JJ.) Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of

the hay 4, 2010 order denying the petition for a writ of

mandamus,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUq May 19, 20l0.

+Xr,w.m of'r\ea-/_e).¢.¢ct/\v/~

N“~Ww

Q/.,...,_s. »‘du@q,,g\, A /720¢/» é`. &¢»L¢¢.,.,./»¢¢(

533 "H~.ri

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tierney v. Perkins, (haw 2010).

Tierney v. Perkins (Tierney v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.