Tierney v. Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii
This text of Tierney v. Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii (Tierney v. Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000432 17-MAY-2012 02:17 PM
NO. SCPW-12-0000432
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
MICHAEL TIERNEY, Petitioner,
vs.
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ICA No. 29993)
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Michael Tierney's petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 17, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tierney v. Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tierney-v-intermediate-court-of-appeals-of-the-sta-haw-2012.