Tierney v. Hawaii Paroling Authority
This text of Tierney v. Hawaii Paroling Authority (Tierney v. Hawaii Paroling Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 3036l
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIT
MlCHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner,
v S » g " ""'-»~J
HAWAll PAROLlNG AUTHORITY, R@Spondent.
am @R:<;:NAL PRocEED:NG 1 €F“» QBQEB (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Michael C. Tierney's petition for a writ of habeas corpus and motion for appointment of counsel, it appears that habeas corpus relief is available to petitioner in
the circuit court and petitioner presents no special reason for
invoking the supreme court’s original jurisdiction. ee Oili v.
788 (l976). Therefore,
5l2, 557 P.2d 787,
57 Haw. 5ll,
Chang,
lT lS HEREBY ORDERED that: (l) the motion for
appointment of counsel is denied and (2) the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice to seeking habeas corpus relief in the circuit court pursuant to HRS § 660-3
(l993).
DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUq M@rCh 17, 2010_
%Ȣ,,u
I`>¢,,,¢,.,LM z?.“'r\a.~)- @Wt”w Wi,vm__é".@"*€€g./ Q\’
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tierney v. Hawaii Paroling Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tierney-v-hawaii-paroling-authority-haw-2010.