TIERNEY v. HARRISON

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Florida
DecidedMarch 23, 2023
Docket4:21-cv-00174
StatusUnknown

This text of TIERNEY v. HARRISON (TIERNEY v. HARRISON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TIERNEY v. HARRISON, (N.D. Fla. 2023).

Opinion

Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER M. TIERNEY, D.O.C.#R56554, Plaintiff, v. 4:21cv174–WS/MAF

SERGEANT HUNTER HARRISON and OFFICER MONTEROUS PRESHA, Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S THIRD REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the court is the magistrate judge’s third report and recommendation (ECF No. 71) entered on March 1, 2023. The magistrate judge recommends that

Defendant Monterous Presha’s motion for summary judgment be denied based on Presha’s waiver of the exhaustion defense. Presha has filed objections (ECF No. 72) to the report and recommendation.

The undersigned has reviewed the record in light of Presha’s objections and has determined that the report and recommendation is due to be adopted. Under controlling Eleventh Circuit law, specifically Bryant v. Rich, 530 F.3d 1368, Page 2 of 2 1374–75 (11th Cir. 2008) and Brooks v. Warden, 706 F. App’x 965, 968 (11th Cir. 2017), Presha forfeited the exhaustion defense by failing to first raise it in his

motion dismiss. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The magistrate judge’s third report and recommendation (ECF No. 71) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant Presha’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 60) is DENIED. 3. The clerk shall return the case to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of March , 2023.

s/ William Stafford WILLIAM STAFFORD SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryant v. Rich
530 F.3d 1368 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Fred Dalton Brooks v. Deputy Warden William Powell
706 F. App'x 965 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
TIERNEY v. HARRISON, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tierney-v-harrison-flnd-2023.