Tierney v. Gould

328 So. 2d 468, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14845
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 1976·No. No. 75-957·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Gordon v. John Deere Company, Fla.1972, 264 So.2d 419; Barton v. Keyes Company, Fla.App. 1974, 305 So.2d 269; Hoffmann v. Three Thousand South Association, Inc., Fla. App.1975, 318 So.2d 486; and Youngblood v. Citrus Associates of New York Cotton Exchange, Inc., Fla.App.1973, 276 So.2d 505; American Baseball Cap, Inc. v. Duzinski, Fla.App. 1975, 308 So.2d 639. However, the order of dismissal is without prejudice to take further proceedings in the appropriate jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tierney v. Gould, 328 So. 2d 468, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14845 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

328 So. 2d 468 (Tierney v. Gould) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barton v. Keyes Company
305 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
American Baseball Cap, Inc. v. Duzinski
308 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Gordon v. John Deere Company
264 So. 2d 419 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
Youngblood v. Citrus Assoc. of NY Cotton Exch., Inc.
276 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Hoffmann v. THREE THOUSAND S. ASSOC., INC.
318 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)